The conflict appears when Rainsford refuses to join the general in such a hunting experience and is therefore forced to survive in the jungle and kill the general and his help. By using various hunting tricks, he manages to kill Ivan and injure Zaroff, making him believe he has killed himself by jumping off a cliff. The story ends with Rainsford winning a fight to the death with Zaroff and getting to use his bed, as a prize for staying alive and winning the game.
Comparing the two stories, the most striking difference lies in the type of story: the first one is a series of memories of a younger boy that tells a story and slowly realizes some of the implications of what he has seen twenty five years before. The second one has a fluid narrative story line, with a clear beginning and end. Other differences can be found in the way characters are described, with a more contemplative approach for Wolfe and a more action oriented for the second one. From a literary point-of-view, one of the main differences is that Wolfe presents an interpretative story and Connell an escape literature piece.
Discussing similarities, the two stories deal in different ways with the same perennial question of good and evil and how one gets to be one or the other. In both stories, two men go from reason-based individuals to instinct based and brutal behaviors. Their reasons are different yet the fundamental question of how one gets to being pure evil is found in both texts. Societal pressures on the one, and lack of purpose in the other create two monsters. Both authors strike an important...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now